Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All India Youth Football Academy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:15, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[All India Youth Football Academy]]=

:{{la|All India Youth Football Academy}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/All_India_Youth_Football_Academy Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|All India Youth Football Academy}})

Non-notable football (soccer) school. No indications of any significant coverage from any source. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete per Nom & GiantSnowman - No indictation of notability, Fails WP:ORG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete -Well, only one source does appear to have some decent coverage of subject, -[http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/aiyfa-leagues-inaugurated/696777/], all others -[http://www.india.com/sports/chennaiyin-fc-isl-team-profile-indian-super-league-2014-teams-and-player-details-167082/], [http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Layout/Includes/TOINEW/ArtWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOIPU%2F2010%2F05%2F20&ViewMode=HTML&GZ=T&PageLabel=6&EntityId=Ar00604&AppName=1] are having only passing/short mentions. It fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete I note the coverage in The Indian Express in October 2010 but I agree with above assessments that it fails to be notable when using the WP:ORG criteria. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete There do not appear to be WP:RS establishing that this passes WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 05:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete - A single instance of significant coverage is insufficient to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Significant coverage in only one source doesn't establish notability.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.