Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Things Equal

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=All Things Equal}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=All Things Equal}})

Fails WP:NORG - no significant coverage and only trivial news sources. Wikipedia generally does not have articles for organisations of this size. Redtree21 (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they fail WP:NORG:

:{{la|B.East}}

:{{la|Cambodia's Kitchen}}

::Withdrawn by nominator - Keep result produced at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodia's Kitchen

:{{la|College Dropout (restaurant)}}

:{{la|Embla (restaurant)}}

:{{la|Enoteca Boccaccio}}

:{{la|Flower Drum}}

:{{la|Gimlet (restaurant)}}

:{{la|Proud Mary Coffee}}

:{{la|Stalactites (restaurant)}}

:{{la|Swagman Restaurant}}

:{{la|Tino (restaurant)}}

:{{la|Vue de Monde}}

:{{la|Section 8 (music venue)}}

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 09:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: Vue de Monde & Flower Drum - sources present establish notability. GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. Too varied to be bundled together. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: B.East. By my reading there are at least two citations in the first sentence where there is WP:CORPDEPTH and which are independent and reliable secondary sources. This AFD is a bit of a dog's breakfast and I would recommend the nominator closing this early and nominating articles that they believe don't meet WP:NCORP separately. TarnishedPath^talk 12:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

::Comment - {{reply to|TarnishedPath}} I appreciate your concerns regarding the bundling of the articles. All of the articles are included in Category:Restaurants in Melbourne, except for Section 8 (music venue) which is linked to from the B.East article. I hope this addresses your concerns. Thank you, Redtree21 (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

:::@Redtree21, I spotted the link. This issue with doing it this way is that you risk all of them being kept when some might be deleted if listed separately. TarnishedPath^talk 13:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

• First, this is too many nominations bundled together. Second, Proud Mary should be kept as the chain has received plenty of secondary coverage in both Australia and the US. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep If you are serious about nominating so many articles, list them individually with a good reason. Coldbolt (talk) 22:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.