Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegheny Land Trust

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Merge can be discussed separately outside AfD if appropriate. Closing as keep per consensus. !voters and nominator can refer to WP:MERGEWHAT for more ideas on merge !votes and how to proceed further. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Allegheny Land Trust]]=

:{{la|1=Allegheny Land Trust}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Allegheny Land Trust}})

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD of merge/redirect to Sewickley (though it isn't currently mentioned there, it is where the group are headquartered) or one of its other incoming links, but it may unbalance those articles. Boleyn (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Merge/Redirect. I think the best target is likely Allegheny County, Pennsylvania#Parks and recreation. The organization gets plenty of local coverage, e.g. [https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette/140011897/], [https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette/140011905/], [https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette/140011912/], [https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette/140011922/], [https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette/140011932/] [https://www.newspapers.com/article/pittsburgh-post-gazette/140011939/]. WP:NONPROFIT is pretty clear though that unless it gets national coverage (which I don't see), it doesn't get a standalone article. Jfire (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

::*Merge per reasoning provided by @Jfire; new references still do not demonstrate national coverage. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.