Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Meadors

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 15:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Allen Meadors]]=

:{{la|Allen Meadors}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Allen_Meadors Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Allen Meadors}})

Grossly promotional article largely written by an account whose name matches that of the subject.

Update: We now have confirmation that the subject paid for this entry to be written. Guy (Help!) 13:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

::Paid editing is perfectly acceptable provided that the user follows the guidelines (which one of them has). Primefac (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Disagree with JzG, Do not see how this article is "grossly promotional". Appears to be

historically based upon subjects professional background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pointer22 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC) — Pointer22 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep as although a few of the links may be unacceptable, I removed the PROD because being the head of three major universities is enough for WP:PROF, and that alone is sufficient. SwisterTwister talk 04:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Grossly promotional to be sure, but Meadors is clearly notable under WP:PROF#C6 (for now, at least). Joe Roe (talk) 13:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment I'm in the process of (essentially) blowing it up. I wish I could just delete the entire thing and let the creator try again... Primefac (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep - passes WP:PROF. The article is certainly promotional, but it's nothing that cannot be fixed. Ya sh ! 07:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.