Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Publishers

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Allied Publishers}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Publishers}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Allied Publishers}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. plicit 09:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Allied Publishers]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Allied Publishers}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Allied Publishers}})

A publisher would count as a company. And this one doesn't have enough sources to qualify for WP:NCORP. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete Gnews is mainly about books published by this company and lacking coverage of the company itself. LibStar (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.