Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi]]=

:{{la|Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi}} ([{{fullurl:Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

10 google hits on "Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi"[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Alpha-Sigma+Omega+Phi%22&btnG=Search], and none are from reliable sources. Also the article doesn't make sense: "The organization was regestered in SEC as a non-profit organization last September 26, 1952", last September would be...2008? Terrillja _talk 19:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Delete. The article fails to establish the notability of this organisation, and seems largely to consist of text copied directly from the external links, a clear copyright violation. --Malleus Fatuorum 19:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Maybe First of all, the reference to 2008 is for the creation of Alpha Theta Sigma, also known as AthetaS. I certainly agree that Alpha Theta Sigma should be AfD'ed for non-notability. However, in terms of Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi, I'm currently trying to establish a notability measure for the List of fraternities and sororities in the Philippines based on what the North-American Interfraternity Conference would require for membership. Alpha-Sigma Omega Phi would meet those criteria, *if* there were any reliable sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naraht (talk • contribs)
Delete I fail to see the notability. And quite frankly, it doesn't even look like it exists. Pstanton 21:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
Delete as they are no reliable sources, and also don't seem all too notable. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 11:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.