Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa George

{{notavote}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Alyssa George}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Alyssa George}})

Fails WP:BIO. Just being Miss Kansas isn't enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:

:{{la|Hannah Wagner}}

See also the AfD for former Miss Kansas Gayla Leigh Shoemake. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, and Kansas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep --Blythd920wkw (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• Keep - Not WP:BLP1E material. --HongKongLewis2828ep (talk) 14:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Meets WP:BIO, WP:V, no WP:CRYSTALBALL here. GOP-Paula-2849WOWQ (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• Keep This should not be deleted under any circumstances - needs WP:CLEANUP. RepublicanParty-Kaitlin-XKC02KW (talk) 14:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• Keep No need to delete - just needs to go on Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography. Very definitely not WP:HOAX. RepublicanParty-Lucia-Kwamkior9202 (talk) 14:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• {{CheckUser note}} I've blocked a bunch of accounts that have commented here as socks. firefly ( t · c ) 14:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
• Sock votes struck by — Trey Maturin™ 14:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

: Delete As per nomination. Pageants and their winners are often contentious in terms of discerning notability - but the fact that most state pageant winners go on to have rather normal, non-notable lives does lend to the current practice of not having pages for individuals who are only known for their pageantry win (which can be seen in the tables for most any state's "Miss...." article. As an aside, what a... strange AfD section. I've never seen anything like it, and I'm genuinely baffled at what the motive and end goal is. A MINOTAUR (talk) 15:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

• Comment Seems like an odd article discussion to be a sockmagnet. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete both: Agree with nom. These subjects each fail WP:GNG as it stands with a lack of secondary coverage. User:Let'srun 12:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete Lacks in-depth coverage that is not a result of the beauty pageant victory. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.