Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amago Yoshihisa

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Amago Yoshihisa}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Amago Yoshihisa}})

This only has one source, Kotobank, and that is not a good one. It fails notability and has been tagged due to lacking sources for years. DrGlef (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep: The corresponding Japanese article makes it clear that the topic is notable. Yes, the sourcing should be improved but that's not an argument for deletion. -- Taku (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: A reasonable WP:BEFORE would have found the references on Ja-Wiki. UtherSRG (talk) 10:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Keep - I echo what the KEEP voters above have said. Subject is historically notable. Goodboyjj (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

• Keep. The Japanese article is very developed and has sources. Kotobbank shows Britannica and the Asahi Japanese Historical Figures Dictionary which are significant. Fulmard (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.