Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Naslund

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

=[[Amber Naslund]]=

:{{la|Amber Naslund}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amber_Naslund Stats])

:({{Find sources|Amber Naslund}})

I don't think this person meets the requirements for relevance to have their own page. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.183.30.96 (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Originally posted on WT:AfD. I am neutral, and I'm going to let Cyberbot transclude this one because I'm lazy wheeeeee Ansh6 6 6 04:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 13. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete I can't find evidence she passes wp:BIO or WP:Author or WP:Corp Neonchameleon (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Delete No independent book reviews of substance. -- GreenC 07:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.