Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambient Electronic Records

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Ambient Electronic Records]]=

:{{la|Ambient Electronic Records}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ambient Electronic Records}})

I can't find any evidence that this record label meets the criteria of WP:N, WP:CORP, or WP:MUSIC. Google search does not bring up substantial coverage in reliable sources. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 03:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Ambient Electronic is a sole owned record label run by me 1 person. The reason the label does not come up on google is because it is registered with the domain ambientrecords.songwritingworld.com Ambient records is connected to Songwriting World which is a free songwriting education website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DOLFINESQUE (talk • contribs) 03:42, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

I have looked through your listings for Electronic Record Labels and many of the labels are self run operations such as my own which are not populare or known by many. The nature of a record label is defined by what it does not its size. Ambiant Records sells Ambient Electronic music and for this reason should stay on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DOLFINESQUE (talk • contribs) 04:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete as selling a specific genre of music does not pass the criteria as outlined by the nom.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 05:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - unremarkable company with no significant claim of importance. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete Zero references, does not even have claims/ text relating to notability. No offense DOLFINESQUE, good luck in your good venture. But criteria for an article in Wikipedia is meeting wp:notability requirements. North8000 (talk) 16:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.