Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aminu Alan Waka

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Aminu Alan Waka]]=

:{{la|Aminu Alan Waka}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aminu_Alan_Waka Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Aminu Alan Waka}})

Promotional article with no evidence of notability Wikigyt@lk to M£ 08:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment: The "Work and Archivement" section is a :WP:COPYVIO of [http://aminuladanabubakar.blogspot.co.uk/ this], complete with its thick layer of :WP:PEACOCKery. I haven't deleted it at this time, as it contains any claim that the person may have to notability, but it would have to be replaced if the article did survive AfD. AllyD (talk) 09:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Certainly not even a minimally better notable and acceptable article. SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO, article references are not useable, a search brings up similar sites, blogs, listings only. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing credible here regarding encyclopaedicity. --Michig (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.