Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amira al Hayb

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that the general notability guideline is met. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 23:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

=[[Amira al Hayb]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amira al Hayb}}

:{{la|Amira al Hayb}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amira_al_Hayb Stats])

:({{Find sources|Amira al Hayb}})

Trivial subject and about a non-notable person. Peleio Aquiles (talk) 22:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 10. Snotbot t • c » 23:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military and combat-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Oppose this deletion. The subject of the article is notable, as evidenced by newspaper coverage, interviews with her and scholarly works in which her life choices are discussed. Article is also well-sourced.--Geewhiz (talk) 14:50, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Per Wikipedia:Notability (people) a person is presumed to be notable if she has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. This person has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, including Haaretz, Maariv etc. Marokwitz (talk) 16:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Keep. Notable firsts are sufficient for inclusion. We have many of them, a number have been taken to AfD and kept on the basis of being a notable first. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.