Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amitabh Bachchan Falls

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Lachung River. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Amitabh Bachchan Falls]]=

:{{la|1=Amitabh Bachchan Falls}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Amitabh Bachchan Falls}})

Fails WP:N. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 08:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Sikkim. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Merge selectively to Lachung River. The falls themselves are mentioned in [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01426397.2022.2134560 Emptying the landscape: outsider place-making, tourism and migration in Sikkim, India], as well as in a bit of news coverage ([https://www.indiatoday.in/lifestyle/travel/story/been-to-amitabh-bachchan-waterfall-in-sikkim-even-big-b-is-shocked-1593619-2019-08-30]). However, I'm not really seeing sources that are ever going to get an article on the falls beyond a stub. WP:GEONATURAL says that {{tq|[i]f a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography}}. In the spirit of both this and WP:NOPAGE, which says that {{tq|at times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic}}, I think we'd be better off merging this article on the falls into the article on the river itself, where the falls can be covered in sufficient depth in the greater context of the river where the falls are. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

:I agree. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 17:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Merge per above. Okoslavia (talk) 15:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.