Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Cohen Banker (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and WP:SALT. RL0919 (talk) 06:00, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Amy Cohen Banker]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Cohen Banker}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Amy Cohen Banker}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amy_Cohen_Banker_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Amy Cohen Banker}})

Fails WP:NCREATIVE same as last time, re-created by sockfarm. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete and salt, I cannot find a single reliable source. All coverage, if you can call it that, seems to be of the user-generated variety. Does not come close to WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete and salt per above. – DarkGlow (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete: No evidence of notability. The "book" Amy Banker Now sounded promising but turns out to be an exhibition catalogue published by the gallery, not substantial enough to have been given an isbn - see [https://www.worldcat.org/title/amy-banker-now/oclc/228440497&referer=brief_results Worldcat]. PamD 12:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  • :Agree, the publication by Janos Gat Gallery is more advert and not a monograph for notability considerations. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete sources are insufficient to support notability.NotButtigieg (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - as per above rationale. Artist is not notable, sufficient sources do not exist. Netherzone (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt clear GNG fail. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.