Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Houck

• {{la|Amy Houck}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amy_Houck Stats])

:({{Find sources|Amy Houck}})

• {{la|440 Artist Alignment}}

:({{Find sources|440 Artist Alignment}})

Puff piece, autobiography by self-identified "social media consultant and branding consultant". Lots of non-RS. Author removed PROD tag without explanation and attempted to remove autobio tag until warned not to do so. Google lookups do not show much outside of her website and company (440 Artist Alignment). Alexf^(talk) 22:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. I don't see enough notability. I see puffery and POV. If she is notable somebody else will come and write an article. This is an autobio. -- Alexf^(talk) 22:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
• Delete as straightforward self-aggrandizement.--Talain (talk) 22:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
• Delete per all the above. GregJackP Boomer! 00:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
• Delete - per the above and per WP:BIO. Some sources cited are not her. This appears to be a sham encyclopedia article pretending. Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
• Delete - have also added 440 Artist Alignment to the list above; the NN company created by the subject/author of the first article. Both fail WP:N fairly clearly. The two "sources" for the second article are the website for the subject and a (probably) self-published article from the creator (does not list the author and is basically just large tracts of quotes from the subject creator). Stalwart111 (talk) 02:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.