Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabella Lenzu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Anabella Lenzu}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabella Lenzu}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Anabella Lenzu}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Anabella Lenzu]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Anabella Lenzu}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Anabella Lenzu}})

This person appears to fail WP:NBIO, as there is no independent reliable coverage of this person in the Google search results. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.