Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anagha Deshpande
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snow keep. Subject meets WP:CRIN, no sense debating this further. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 23:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
=[[Anagha Deshpande]]=
:{{la|Anagha Deshpande}} – (
:({{Find sources|Anagha Deshpande}})
NO notable links for notability- not even a single one. 2 sources are from Wikipedia which does not have the players name in it Ananyaprasad (talk) 13:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Snow keep. This is a poor-faith nomination, seemingly in retaliation for the deletion of an article created by the nominator. (There is some discussion of this here). The two sources that are provided are not circular references, are published by reliable websites that are used on thousands of cricket-related articles and clearly indicate that this is an international sportswoman who has represented her country at first-class level. It satisfies the WP:ATHLETE criteria. - Sitush (talk) 12:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:CRIN - does have a couple of reliable independent sources. Nomination looks like an error? Clavdia chauchat (talk) 13:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
:::: I had nominated two articles at the same time but I just wonder why all present to delete Rashmi Singh author have jumped here and not at Faraaz Kazi? Now what is this? What does this suggest? Good faith? No one has peeped into the other one. I am not saying that Anagha D is not notable but Faraaz Kazi has all spam! Will you all move from here and spare some time to check it! Ananyaprasad (talk) 15:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
::::: I looked at this one purely because it popped up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport/Article alerts. I'm not too interested in any other point you are making elsewhere! If you now agree this person is notable, are you withdrawing this AfD? Clavdia chauchat (talk) 16:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Not entirely sure why this was nominated, a quick read of WP:CRIN shows the cricketer is clearly notable. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per arguments already made above, clearly meets our notability criteria. Harrias talk 22:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 October 29. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 09:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Appears to easily meet WP:CRIN.204.126.132.231 (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.