Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anartism

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[Anartism]]=

:{{la|Anartism}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anartism Stats])

:({{Find sources|Anartism}})

Essentially, Original research by synthesis some kind of manifesto for an artistic movement that contains no reliable sources to demonstrate its use by any expert source. A prod tag was removed by the author for a reason not based in Wikipedia policy. Although I found two references for this neologism in the literature, it is far from clear to me that those authors and this article are referring to the same ideas and I suggest that the idea doesn't have sufficient notability to remain. Ubelowme U Me 18:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment The article wording is obviously derived from the lead section of the Wikipedia article on :Anarchism. As such it has inherited for itself various claims, such as being "a mass social movement (that) has regularly endured fluctuations in popularity" which is true of anarchism, false of anartism. To that extent the article is arguable a WP:CSD G3 hoax? AllyD (talk) 19:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per G3 of the CSD criteria. Buggie111 (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete per A7 of the CSD criteria. This so-called movement is not related to the idea of Anartism as explored by Hélène Parmelin, and lacks notability on its own. RDHolland (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.