Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia Servan-Schreiber

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. plicit 14:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Anastasia Servan-Schreiber]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Anastasia Servan-Schreiber}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Anastasia Servan-Schreiber}})

Subject started her PhD last year, so it's likely too soon for a pass of our notability guideline for academics and I don't see any other indicators of notability. – Joe (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

:Delete Per nom. The reflist seems not to contain independent sigcov. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 17:04, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 18:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is normally the point where I would complain about the previous !vote not considering WP:PROF and where I would point out that sigcov is irrelevant for PROF. But in this case, the previous !vote is on-point. It's obvious she is far too junior to pass PROF, and the only hope is enough sigcov to pass WP:GNG instead. The only possibility, the koiduaeg.ee source, might be a reliable source for all I know but it doesn't have much depth of coverage about the subject. Nothing else in the article or in my web searches was even close. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nom--Estopedist1 (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.