Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient black influence in early medicine

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Ancient black influence in early medicine]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Ancient black influence in early medicine}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ancient_black_influence_in_early_medicine Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Ancient black influence in early medicine}})

WP:POVFORK of Ancient Egyptian medicine trying to present the point of view that Egyptians were black. Not useful as a redirect. Natureium (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Natureium (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Agricolae (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete - per nom. It is simply a discussion of well-attested ancient Egyptian influence on medicine, portrayed as a racial phenomenon by dressing it in the fringe and irrelevant assertion that ancient Egypt was 'black' (whatever that means). Ancient Egyptian medicine is sufficient, no matter what racial category one chooses to place them in. Agricolae (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom and the per lead of the article which clearly states that the notion that Egyptian contributions = Black contributions is bunk. Especially since "Kemet = black community" is patently misleading, given most scholars thinks this refers to the black soils of the Nile, and not skin color. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. signed, Rosguill talk 23:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete – nomination statement pretty much says it all. – bradv🍁 23:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  • So I agree with everyone else but I wonder if there is any content in the section Ancient_black_influence_in_early_medicine#Ancient_medicine that deserves to be merged to some other article? (The section looks to be unique in not being about Egypt.) --JBL (talk) 23:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  • :{{u|Joel B. Lewis}}, perhaps to Traditional African medicine? – bradv🍁 00:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • :: {{ping|Bradv}} Good suggestion, I have left a note on the talkpage there in case anyone thinks it has usable content. --JBL (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom. Also the account that created this article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/WIKIRedPanda99] looks like a single purpose account to create the article and nothing else. Psychologist Guy (talk) 13:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • : {{ping|Psychologist Guy}} That user's very first edits identify exactly who they were and what they were doing. --JBL (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. –dlthewave 14:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete -- This is a poor POV fork. The very title associates ancient Egyptians with being Black, but that normally refers to people of sub-Saharan Africa, not including Egypt. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is a WP:Education project gone bad. jps (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete As with above, very forky.Slatersteven (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.