Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andandand Creative

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Andandand Creative]]=

:{{la|Andandand Creative}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andandand_Creative Stats])

:({{Find sources|Andandand Creative}})

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which would evidence notability under WP:CORP. j⚛e deckertalk 06:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep Seems notable based on sourcing from books. Needs background information, more reliable sources added. Strawberrie Fields (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lacks coverage in reliable sources, and lacks any indication that this is a notable company. I found one piece about the company's work on the Mirror's website ([http://www.designweek.co.uk/news/mirrorcouk-relaunches-website-with-creative/3033891.article]), but that's about it. --Michig (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (tell me stuff) @ 20:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

: Delete This article is just an advert. Not a notable company carrying out a non notable service. Op47 (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.