Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ander Bardají

:{{la|Ander Bardají}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ander_Bardaj%C3%AD Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Ander Bardají}})

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator based on the argument that other stuff exists. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. A case of WP:TOOSOON at best. Fenix down (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• Keep I would argue that this page should be kept - the player has been given a squad number which means he is in the 25-man list of professional players for the season. He is a goalkeeper, only 1 is allowed to play at a time and it is a critical role, so a promising young player is less likely to be given a chance; similarly a substitute appearance is also very rare in the position. It is quite unusual for a player in the squad of an elite football club to NOT have a page, although to look at his playing stats would suggest it is quite a weak case for a notable subject. Crowsus (talk) 03:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

::WP:NFOOTBALL explicitly says that only covers footballers who have played in a match for in a fully pro league or received significant coverage. Players who have not made their debut for either are not included. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - yet to debut; can be recreated if this debut ever does happen Spiderone 15:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - classic WP:CBALL, can always be created in the future if necessary. Inter&anthro (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
• can't argue with the guidelines, although I do think it doesn't look great to have a red/black player on the squad list for a club in the #1 ranked league Crowsus (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.