Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Gaard
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
=[[Andrew Gaard]]=
:{{la|Andrew Gaard}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Andrew Gaard}})
Advertorially toned WP:BLP, relying entirely on primary sources rather than reliable source coverage in media, of a junior-level athlete and future Olympic hopeful. While he's accomplished enough already that an article could be kept if the RS coverage were there to support it, there's nothing here that gives him an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, if the sourcing is this weak. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he actually makes the Olympic team. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This article is on a college rower who if I understand what the article says correctly, it is not well written, has the goal of competing in the 2020 Olympics. If he actually does that he will be notable, at present he is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete by all means, simply nothing actually convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable. Tom29739
[ talk] 00:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.