Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lih

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive515#Andrew_Lih. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 08:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Andrew Lih]]=

:{{la|Andrew Lih}} ([{{fullurl:Andrew Lih|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Lih}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I mean no disrespect and know the inclination is to include Wikipedia-related topics, but does an interview by CNN and a book that's released next month (vanity by an admirer?) give that much notoriety? Poowe (talk) 04:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

:Keep Although not notable but I my view should be kept.User:Yousaf465

::Was that a joke? You're making my case for me. Poowe (talk) 04:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 05:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

:::*Comment - The purpose of AfD is to seek consensus as to whether or not an article meets the guidelines for inclusion. Not to make a "case" for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog 07:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.