Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Solomon (Blake scholar)

:{{la|Andrew Solomon (Blake scholar)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrew_Solomon_(Blake_scholar) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Andrew Solomon (Blake scholar)}})

Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

• Sorry, I do not understand the reason for the deletion. Andrew Solomon is internationally recognized and notable author of at least of three excellent books on William Blake. --Dmitrismirnov (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

::{{replyto|Dmitrismirnov}} Please offer independent reliable sources to support what you are saying. This would be things like independent reviews of this person's work in the field. 331dot (talk) 11:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

:::Here is Andrew Solomon's biographical entry that supports my opinion on him in the Russian philological journal "Language. Philology. Culture" [http://publishing-vak.ru/personalii/solomon.htm] . There are two very special articles of him published in the magazine in English as well as in Russian translation. They are also available online: [http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-philology-2014-1/1-andrew-solomon.pdf] and [http://wikilivres.ru/images/4/42/1-solomon.pdf] --Dmitrismirnov (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

::::The link is to Russian publishing house that prints books for profit, making authors to pay. It's hardly a reliable source. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

:::I will try to find an independent expert as well. --Dmitrismirnov (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

• Delete. Writing some books on Blake does not make a person notable.--Rpclod (talk) 13:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
• Delete unless evidence is offered of the "international recognition" of this person's work. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
• Delete feel free to ping me to reconsider if I'm missing something. But, as far as I can see, Solomon is published several books about Blake with a small press Palamabron Press, but I can't find any mention of Solomon on JSTOR and, although he died in 2017, I can't find an obit. To be sure, there is a very notable Andrew Solomon who dominates searches, but searching with keyword: Blake failed to turn up sources. And even searches on his book To Build Jerusalem turned up only teh online journal of The Blake Society.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
• Hello to everybody. I am PhD in Philology, I'm from Russia and I'd like to tell that Andrew Solomon is worth the Wiki page as a Blake scholar. His book is interesting, and I discovered much new things translating his article to Russian, to publish it in our journal "Language. Literature. Culture" (Yazyk. Slovesnost'. Kui'tura). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rintra (talk • contribs) 16:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
• Delete does not meet our notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.