Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Fish

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

=[[Andy Fish]]=

:{{la|Andy Fish}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Fish}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Andy Fish}})

Non-Notable Person, and completly biased article. Found5dollar (talk) 23:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Fish is legit

http://artscopemagazine.com/asdyn/index.wr?is=20&a=1

http://media.www.berkeleybeacon.com/media/storage/paper169/news/2008/03/27/News/Graphic.Novel.Program.Could.Become.New.Major-3287632.shtml

http://www.telegram.com/article/20081009/NEWS/810090468

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-181614596.html

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-194261977.html

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-202509984.html

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-190138817.html

http://www.emerson.edu/ce/programs/certificate/Graphic-Novel-Certificate.cfm

http://thelittlechimpsociety.com/andyfish/emerson-college-honors-graphic-novels-by-andy-fish/

The efforts to remove his listing are politically biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UnderCoverFish (talk • contribs) 00:33 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep, sources show notability. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep, links are indicative of notable artistic career. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.80.219 (talk) 03:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Weak keep based on sources found so far. Anything more reliable? Bearian (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.