Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Cassidy

=[[Angel Cassidy]]=

:{{la|Angel Cassidy}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Angel Cassidy}})

Fails to meet any of the four WP:PORNBIO criteria, as she has not won a well-known award; has not received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years; has not made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre; and has not been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. NW (Talk) 22:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

::Keep, well-known in the industry. --Hixteilchen (talk) 14:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

:*That is not a valid criteria to retain an article in the Wikipedia. Please provide a valid rationale so your !vote will not be discounted entirely. Tarc (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - Single AVN interview does not pass the WP:GNG. Being a co-producer of one film does not pass WP:CREATIVE. A single nomination does not pass WP:PORNBIO. Fails notability standards by any reasonable, non-biased assessment of the subject matter. Tarc (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG, all nontrivial GNews hits apparently refer to different people, including one other sex worker using the same pseudonym. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.