Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Felice Coniglio

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 01:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

=[[Angelo Felice Coniglio]]=

:{{la|Angelo Felice Coniglio}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Angelo Felice Coniglio}})

Sounds like a biography, doesnt provide much information outside of personal interests.

many of the edits were made by the user himself |anon| -20091202212702

Delete - Retired guy who doesn't seem to have accomplished anything WP:Notable. A lot of the article is about his hobbies. --MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
Speedy delete - not even a claim of notability, possible conflicts. Bearian (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I believe that both the 1993 Educator of the Year award and the claims of widespread press coverage for his football web site are claims of notability. Not very good ones for an AfD, possibly, but enough to stave off A7 deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Delete - There are a few (minor) claims to notability, so it doesn't quite come under A7. But it's not enough to meet the WP:GNG either. Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 19:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.