Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anime World Order

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - seems to be good consensus: the only keeps included the article creator and the other admitted that the article needed better sourcing. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 22:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

=[[Anime World Order]]=

:{{la|Anime World Order}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Anime and manga podcast. Can't find any non-trivial coverage of this podcast in reliable sources or anything that makes it meet the WP:WEB notability guidelines. Was nominated for a Parsec Award, but did not win it (WP:WEB says it has to win the award) and I can't find any reliable sources that talk about the nomination. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 00:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

As per the external source link, which is also part of the official Parsec Awards web site, (http://parsecawards.com/2007Finalists), it was indeed nominated, and furthermore was named by the steering committee as a finalist.Jhar 12:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The podcast was also reviewed in Anime News Network's "Hey, Answerman!" column on June 15, 2007.[http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/answerman/2007-06-15] --Farix (Talk) 13:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —Farix (Talk) 13:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete per WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Evb-wiki 14:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep I won't fully or strongly object, since I am the article creator. However, I do feel that this show is popular and relevant enough to warrant an article, as it is easily the second most popular anime-related podcast on the net. Jhar 13:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep With coverage by both Anime News Network and Ain't It Cool News, it is able to pass WP:NOTE and subsequently WP:WEB. The content of the article, however, needs to be better referenced. --Farix (Talk) 20:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
weak Delete Ain't It Cool News is hardly a reliable source, and WP:WEB requires that any web content "...has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works..." in order to be notable. The article only has search results and top ten lists as references. Would change to a keep if some more reliable sources directly about the subject could be found. Sbacle 16:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Until and unless independent, reliable sources can be found. Eluchil404 00:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.