Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anind Dey

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 23:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Anind Dey]]=

:{{la|Anind Dey}} ([{{fullurl:Anind Dey|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anind Dey}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article tagged by User:Curiosor with the following edit summary: "AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anind DeyThis article should be deleted because the person does meet the general notability guidelines." I'm just finishing it. Jobjörn (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep Top results on google scholar: 997 citations, 837 citations, 837 citations, 525 citations, 465 citations, 188, 193... need I go on? Jfire (talk) 21:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy keep. No, no need to go on. Really. Jobjörn (talk) 21:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep Huge number of citations, clearly passes WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 22:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.