Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjali Phougat

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Anjali Phougat}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Anjali Phougat}})

Not notable. She's a mid-level exec with a side hustle. Neither the day job nor the design work establish notability. Cabayi (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

{{Not a ballot}}

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

:KEEP This person has achieved great success and her film won best short film award and she presented her collection on Cannes film festival and have significant coverage in reliable sources. Not everyone accomplish and get so many recognitions from international institutes by doing side hustle. very well deserved to be on the platform since she is inspiration to many fellow woman's and continuously working towards social causes. Kayle123 (talk) 18:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

::— {{user|Kayle123||}} has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. {{#if:|There's an SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{spi}}}.{{sp}}|}}Cabayi (talk) 19:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

::— no longer true, as Kayle123 has made other edits. David notMD (talk) 00:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - Based on my WP:BEFORE and a review of the article and its sources, it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for WP:BASIC or WP:CREATIVE notability to be supported by independent and reliable sources. There is a [https://myfox28columbus.com/news/local/columbus-fashion-council-mobilizing-designers-boutiques-to-respond-to-coronavirus local FOX affiliate] that names her fashion brand as one of several creating face masks for medical providers in 2020, a 2021 [https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/lifestyle/self-love-is-important-says-celebrity-talk-show-host-anjali-phougat-253660 interview] in The Tribune, a 2021 bylined [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/fashion/designers/designer-anjali-phougats-short-film-gets-recognition-at-the-cannes-film-festival/articleshow/84644067.cms Times of India article] ("not only did she showcase her collection, but also won the best film award under the Global Short Film Awards category at the prestigious film festival") that is mostly an interview, a 2021 [https://www.nayasabera.com/2021/05/anjali-phougat-on-her-latest-short-film.html interview] about her film in what may be a blog, and several posts [https://lehren.com/entertainment/bollywood/anjali-phougat-reveals-her-experience-of-interviewing-sonu-nigam/82561/ 1], [https://lehren.com/entertainment/television/sia-in-cannes-festival-red-carpet/88470/ 2], [https://lehren.com/entertainment/bollywood/anjali-representing-india-at-cannes/88596/ 3], [https://lehren.com/entertainment/bollywood/anjali-phougat-urges-all-to-take-time-out-for-their-loved-ones/82890/ 4] from a website with an [https://lehren.com/ethics-corrections-standards/ Ethics section] that includes, "this policy should not be considered as universal for every scenario or as hard established rules", and "The news and information are sometimes reviewed by more than one editor and may include fact-checks." During my review, I removed sources listed as unreliable at WP:ICTFSOURCES and several other blog sources. Beccaynr (talk) 03:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

• Keep - Based on my review of the article and its sources, it appears that we should give time to improve the article and support by adding more reliable sources as a community and should not vote for deleting the article. I see good press coverage when google this person and strongly recommend to give time and improve the article instead of deleting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliana000 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC) — Juliana000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

: — Juliana000 and Kayle123 (above) have each been blocked as sockpuppets of Punjabier. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

• Delete There are really no claims to reach even close to WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. It must be reiterated that simply by being associated or related with notable stuff doesn't grant you notability. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
• Keep as I have cleaned up the article and she has won some awards. We need some help with local language sources which I suspect exist. Pass WP:GNG. Hwa Sangwook (talk) 04:32, 20 August 2021 (UTC) — Hwa Sangwook (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Article promotes her business. David notMD (talk) 04:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.