Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Jonas

:{{la|Ann Jonas}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ann_Jonas Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ann Jonas}})

Notability is not established for this author's CV of an article, which could well be here for publicity. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 18. Snotbot  t • c »  15:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

• Keep. [http://www.nccil.org/experience/artists/crewsfam/ajonas.htm This source] is sufficient for general notability, IMO, and her body of work (15 books, almost all of which are still in print, published by mainstream publishers and reviewed by reputable sources) appears to me to be sufficient for WP:ARTIST. --Orlady (talk) 18:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
• Keep author of an ala notable book is sufficient, especially in context of her many other books. This isn't a or promotional, just a straightforward bio with a bibliography. DGG ( talk ) 04:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.