Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Vorontsova (Tretyakova)

=[[Anna Vorontsova (Tretyakova)]]=

:{{la|Anna Vorontsova (Tretyakova)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anna_Vorontsova_(Tretyakova) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Anna Vorontsova (Tretyakova)}})

Almsot certainly not notable under either the GNG or WP:PROF, based on the information given. The ed. is apparently creating articles about every faculty member in the department, regardless of likely notability DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


  • As I said for the nom on prof. Kozyr, I wish I knew more about law or the Russian academic system to comment more authoritatively; the works list looks both impressive (in size) and run-of-the-mill (in forums published) at the same time. I would prefer not to be commenting, but since no one else is, my feeling (which is more sure than with the Olga Kozyr AfD) is, agree with nom. Delete -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 22:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.