Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Harrington

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Speedy keep to Snow Keep Early close. Professor in a named chair. (non-admin closure) scope_creep^Talk 12:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Anne Harrington]]=

:{{la|Anne Harrington}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anne_Harrington Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Anne Harrington}})

Not Notable. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy keep. A totally inadequate nomination that deserves a WP:Trout. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC).
Speedy keep per WP:PROF C1 and C5 (named professor at Harvard!) and also WP:AUTHOR (searching JSTOR for her name finds many reviews of her books) and give BeenAroundAWhile some side-eye for nominating three highly-notable female academics for deletion in quick succession. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Strong Keep: I'm with Xxanthippe on the trout slap. This subject holds a named chair at one of the world's most prestigious universities -- what the pluperfect hell? This wouldn't be acceptable for a newcomer, but for a veteran nom with over 80,000 edits, this is mindboggling. I was likewise about to look at the nom's other recent AfDs. Ravenswing 07:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Snow keep: I have added her most recent book, referenced to substantial review articles in The Atlantic and the New York Times earlier this year. The subject meets the :WP:AUTHOR criteria as well as :WP:NACADEMIC criterion 5 by virtue of her named chair. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.