Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Lindfjeld (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Anne Lindfjeld]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Lindfjeld}}

:{{la|1=Anne Lindfjeld}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Anne Lindfjeld}})

Article been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years. No coverage except social media. Refs are 404. Fails WP:SIGCOV. No coverage. scope_creep^Talk 22:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, Fashion, and Denmark. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NBIO. I could not find any significant coverage for this person. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Weak delete beyond social media, found the odd mention (e.g. https://www.seoghoer.dk/kendte/maschas-mange-facetter-playboy-bunny-frederik-og-mary), but not enough independant significant coverage to warrant a pass of WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Actually digging a bit more - the English translation of the Danish Wikipedia has some more info at https://da-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Anne_Lindfjeld?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp which also led me to https://www-avisen-dk.translate.goog/Pages/Guests/Articles/2020/ShowTemplatedArticle.aspx?ArticleID=74548&Type=74548&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp Still not really significant coverage though. Also, refs being 404 is not a reason to delete, especially when pages are archived. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

:::That second ref was the original ref that was posted in the previous Afd. There is really not much apart from that and the Danish WP has the same problems as the this article, namely extreme tenuousness, lack of coverage. A single ref doesn't cut it and and there is no coverage, nor will there be. scope_creep^Talk 23:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.