Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Mondro

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The consensus is that this fails to meet wikipedia requirements, namely WP:BIO. Ty 00:57, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

=[[Anne Mondro]]=

:{{la|Anne Mondro}} ([{{fullurl:Anne Mondro|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Mondro}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Appears to fail WP:BIO. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. And I've removed her resume from the article per WP:BLOG. ~~SIS~~ 01:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

This article is accurate and does following the criteria for a wikipedia article. It is on a relevant contemporary American artist and has ties with SNAG (society of north american goldsmiths) which is also an article on wikipedia. I have included multiple sources and a legally obtained photo from the artist for the article. I do not understand why this is warranting a deletion nomination, I think it is unfair and the article should be kept.Aeb234 (talk) 03:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete This is an encyclopedia, not a listing of everyone who has ever been in a group exhibition, joined an artist group or had a teaching job. Modernist (talk) 13:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.