Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annex (Trilogy)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Talk · ^Review 00:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Annex (Trilogy)]]=

:{{la|Annex (Trilogy)}} ([{{fullurl:Annex (Trilogy)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annex (Trilogy)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Annex_(Trilogy)&diff=279022042&oldid=279020425 Contested prod]. Fails WP:BK: unfinished book, unknown author. Hqb (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete, I agree with nom: fails WP:BK, and has an unremarkable authour. Genius 101^Guestbook 22:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - fails notability criteria, is all original research, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Jd027 (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete: An article on a trilogy that does not exist by a nn author. Not a single reliable source to be found. Victoriagirl (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete per Victoriagirl. Gonzonoir (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete The nominator is succinct & on target; this should have been deleted before it reached AfD. -- llywrch (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.