Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anno Domini Beats

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 02:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Anno Domini Beats]]=

:{{la|Anno Domini Beats}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anno_Domini_Beats Stats])

:({{Find sources|Anno Domini Beats}})

Having reviewed this article I am unable to find reliable sources that support any of the text about this company. The references that are used to support the article are either minor (i.e.: personal blogs) or self referential. Having reviewed the edit history and followed the external links it is evident that this article was created and predominantly (almost exclusively) edited either by the founder of this company or an employee which is further evidence that it is not currently notable and not currently meriting a Wikipedia article about it. Given what the article contends then its notability should be such that it would have been created and edited by individual(s) without such a significant conflict of interest regarding the subject of the article. OmniArticleEditor (talk) 22:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 22:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. Could not find anything that would meet WP:CORP or the art categories, either.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 08:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - Big claims, no sourcing, a few trivial mentions in some hiphop sites on Google News, but nothing meeting GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.