Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Church (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No refutation to the nomination statement was shown; the only Keep !vote was WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Black Kite (talk) 12:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[Anthony Church]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Church}}

:{{la|Anthony Church}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anthony_Church_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Anthony Church}})

Speedy deletion was decline. Mr. Church still has not played in a fully professional league, he is not a full international, and he has not received significant coverage, meaning this article still fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:KEEP: I don't see a reason to delete this article when other article's for example Richard Brodie are allowed to remain. Brodie although contracted to a Football League team hasn't played in a professional league and like Church has only played in the Conference National at the highest level. Both are professional footballers, and both have England C team caps, same rule should apply. In my opinion they are both notable Footballgy (talk) 15:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

::Comment He was on a professional contract at a professional club with Grimsby.Footballgy (talk) 16:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:::The inclusion criteria is playing in a fully professional league. For England that means, any of the top four divisions. Mr. Church has not played above the fifth. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

  • KEEP Give the article time to grow and pass WP:GNG, I know for a fact it is capable of passing if you give it time to expand. FishyPhotos (talk) 08:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

:What may happen is speculation, which is never grounds for notability per WP:CRYSTAL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 09:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

::It may or may not, I know for a fact there are enough credible sources available to compile a decent enough article. FishyPhotos (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

:::Then present them. Notability requires verifiable evidence. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

::::As stated above, the article is not going to be kept solely on an unsupported claim that there are theoretical sources out there. If they exist, include them in the article and make a note here so that editors can re-assess. Simply repeatedly stating "there are sources out there" isn't going to cut it, I'm afraid.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.