Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Keith Johnson

:{{la|Anthony Keith Johnson}} ([{{fullurl:Anthony Keith Johnson|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Keith Johnson}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Person does not assert notability (only primary sources mentioning him, none from the third-party). ^blurred_peace ☮ 05:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. I had PRODded this nearly concurrently to the AfD nom, so I'll restate my PROD concern: "No assertion of notability for the convict, the victim/crime, the legal proceedings, or the public or legal aftermath". I'd even contemplated speedying it as an essay with a total lack of asserted notability. And I'll also bundle the following article with this AfD:

:*{{la|Stephen K. Johns}}

:which is in the same style and has all of the same problems.DMacks (talk) 05:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

::Oops, looks like it became its own nom. DMacks (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

• Delete - not notable per WP:BIO1E and Notability (criminal acts). An encyclopedia does not need a blow-by-blow account of every murder. JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:BIO1E. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.