Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Maule

:{{la|Anthony Maule}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Anthony Maule}})

I am not convinced that this person, whilst perhaps being an excellent photographer, passes the requirements laid out at WP:BIO and specifically at WP:CREATIVE. The article has been in existence for over 2 years and thus the primary author, who also seems to be the subject of the article, should have become familiar with syntax, etc. (see last edit summary). As the primary author contested the prod, which is his right, I would like the larger wikipedia community to weigh in on this article and decide whether the subject has sufficient notability as pertains to Wikipedia biographical articles. Thank you. Avi (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Avi (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. As-is, it fails WP:CREATIVE. Insufficient sources to assert notability. Being a fashion photographer, with no major awards, is to me no different than any other professional earning a living at their job, no matter how good they are at it. -- Alexf^(talk) 18:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.