Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Batagov

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Leaning towards keep, as several reliable sources were discussed and don't seem to have been specifically challenged. ST47 (talk) 13:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Anton Batagov]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Anton Batagov}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anton_Batagov Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Anton Batagov}})

I found https://www.forbes.com/sites/jenslaurson/2018/03/21/classical-cd-of-the-week-anton-batagovs-bach-is-for-tripping/ but I cannot find any unaffiliated sources that discuss the subject or his works. At the very least, the article (and the Russian, French and Japanese ones) need to be re-written to remove unsourced content and promotional tone. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep. Easily passes WP:GNG. One should simply do search in Russian and immediately find numerous books with non-trivial description of the person, [https://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2,+%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD&client=firefox-b-1-d&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjmqsu6veXlAhVKRa0KHSolDuEQ_AUIECgB&biw=1688&bih=913&dpr=1], news, etc. My very best wishes (talk) 20:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Even the Russian sources are passing mentions or not reliable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • No, absolutely not. These Russian books are totally reliable RS, and they cover the subject in depth and clearly establish his notability: "Антон Батагов — широко известный композитор, пианист, общественный деятель — лидирующая фигура в искусстве minimal art. Музыкальные события последнего времени — концерты в Москве, Пермский международный ...". My very best wishes (talk) 04:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • A passing mention in a book is proof that it covers the subject in depth? I take it that's why they're not used in the Russian-language article either. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Please check [https://books.google.com/books?id=pzadCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA77&dq=%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2,+%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwigvLiFuu_lAhVSUK0KHfFBBfoQuwUwAHoECAUQBg#v=onepage&q=%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%2C%20%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD&f=false the book]. At least five full pages are about him, and this is an academic-oriented book on the subject of music in 20th century. The subject is described as a "leader" in his area. This is nothing "passing". My very best wishes (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable, only brief mentions in sources and promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.53.12.89 (talk) 12:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. Passes WP:NMUSIC. He was a finalist in the 1986 International Tchaikovsky Competition in Moscow. His recordings and compositions have been reviewed in major publications, and his work has been studied in academic publications within the field of musicology. See:
  1. "BACH: Partitas 4+6; Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring.(Guide to Records)"; Haskins, American Record Guide, 2018, Vol.81(1), p.69(1)
  2. "Film Reviews: MUSIC FOR DECEMBER"; Stratton, David; Jul 24, 1995; Variety (Archive: 1905-2000), Vol.359(12), p.74
  3. "First Performances"; Tempo, 1992(182), pp.25-32
  4. "Winning and losing in russian new music today.(p.487-511)"; Quillen, William; Journal of the American Musicological Society, 2014, Vol.67(2), p.487(25)

:Passes WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 09:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Leaning to Keep as GNG refs have not been challenged; try one last re-list

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

:: This editors votes are problematic as per their talkpage [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fifthavenuebrands&diff=prev&oldid=926318909 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fifthavenuebrands&diff=926351424&oldid=926325030 here], Atlantic306 (talk) 22:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

::* {{ping|Fifthavenuebrands}} I checked yesterday saw that that this was a new account. And it is usually not the place to begin editing so quickly. The first edit was to nominate an article for deletion. That is usually something for an experienced editor. And then !voting {{tq|56 AFDs in 36 minutes}}. Please slow down. There is not a good way to asses notability so quickly. Wm335td (talk) 22:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete - Non notable - Jay (talk) 08:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.