Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anulomana

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

=[[Anulomana]]=

:{{la|Anulomana}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anulomana Stats])

:({{Find sources|Anulomana}})

Delete or redirect to Ayurveda where it can be mentioned as a property of Ayurveda medicine Dougweller (talk) 10:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete per my PROD: "this def is editor's analysis/synthesis among many meanings and ideas in the cited refs". DMacks (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Ive since added a reference which confirms that it is not my own analysis,i feel this reference is sufficient--Prestigiouzman (talk) 11:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

:Comment You miss the point - this is still a dictionary definition. Where I find this word not used as a definition is in relationship to Ayurveda. There's no reason for a standalone article. Dougweller (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete. The page is, and apparently is intended to be, a dictionary definition. Ayurveda does not appear to mention the term, so redirect would be somewhat inappropriate, unless new or merged content is added there. The word does not appear to be in Wiktionary, so transwiki might not be out of the question, but they would want it in Devanagari rather than Latin script. Cnilep (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Devanagari script instated--Prestigiouzman (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete as DicDef, consider soft redirect to WIkitionary. Fiddle Faddle 09:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

::{{comment}} Page-creator is indef'ed on wiktionary for both unacceptable-page creation and incivil behavior. DMacks (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

:::{{comment}}Block also mentions "nonsense/gibberish"

Delete dictionary definition when the inadequately sourced content is removed. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete WP:DICDEF. Implausible redirect. Please note that the page creator, Prestigiouzman, was blocked for lack of competence. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.