Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anya Olsen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of independent reliable sources to establish notability. I note that the article was significantly expanded during the AFD, but the additions did not sway any of the comments that came after. RL0919 (talk) 23:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Anya Olsen]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Anya Olsen}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anya_Olsen Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Anya Olsen}})

Non-notable adult actress. Written like self-promotional spam without sufficient references demonstrating notability. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC) Added link to establish notability --Garver1UofA (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. References are junk and an independent search for RS coverage yielded a brief mention in VICE. Minor awards would not have satisfied any version of the now superseded WP:PORNBIO SNG. No good sources to support WP:ENT or WP:BASIC notability. • Gene93k (talk) - References include direct interviews, they are solid sources. --Garver1UofA (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Not a notable performer. The coverage in Vice is just a passing mention. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:18, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete does not pass WP:GNG or WP:PORNBIO if it was still extant, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete a non-notable pornagraphic actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete - It's kind of weak that one of the top sources is her own Twitter feed. Michepman (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.