Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo OS

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted per G3 by User:Gwen Gale. Non-admin close.. ukexpat (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

=[[Apollo OS]]=

:{{la|Apollo OS}} ([{{fullurl:Apollo OS|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo OS}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Not notable; the only references are self-published. KurtRaschke (talk) 03:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Keep. What about MikeOS, Visopsys and the rest of other 'hobby' OSes out there? Anyway, Wikipedia sux, if the first thing I get on my Talk Page since July is an Afd, so be it. Oh, and it's much better than the aforementioned articles; and from a neutral point of view, nothing seems to be wrong with it. Interest has been raised about Apollo a while now, it seems right to have an article like the others. NoKindOfName (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete for lack of reliable secondary sources. If the article is correct about the status of the project, there won't be any for a while. WillOakland (talk) 07:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Since the OS is still in testing and not being used, unlike the entries mentioned by the article creator. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Forget it. But I'll be deleting the MikeOS, Visopsys and related articles too, so watch out. NoKindOfName (talk) 16:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.