Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Area Police/Private Security Liaison

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Although a branch like this does not typically deserve an article of its own - and shouldn't - there's no consensus in this discussion to delete. This does not preclude future AFD's (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:38, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

=[[Area Police/Private Security Liaison]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Security Liaison}}

:{{la|Area Police/Private Security Liaison}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Area_Police/Private_Security_Liaison Stats])

:({{Find sources|Private Security Liaison}})

No reliable sources; Not notable. Hopkinsenior (talk) 07:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Delete not notable. --Shorthate (talk) 22:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Keep The program has gotten a ton of Reliable Source coverage per [http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Area+Police/Private+Security+Liaison%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=%22Area+Police/Private+Security+Liaison%22&hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&rls=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=pla5UP2OO8r0qAG8jIC4Dg&ved=0CB0QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=f2f636301d07e039&bpcl=39314241&biw=1003&bih=633 Google News]. Somebody needs to add some of these sources to the article, which currently has only one reference and that a dead link. But notability is based on AVAILABLE sources and there clearly are a lot of sources available. --MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

::P. S. Possibly the reason people thought there weren't sources is they were searching under APPL, rather than Area Police/Private Security Liaison which is the actual name of the article. For some reason this AfD was listed under the redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley (public) _talk 00:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep per the sources found above. Morefoolhim 19:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ^{talk to me!} 09:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Delete as non-notable program, or as a second choice, merge to New York City Police Department. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.