Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arevik Udumyan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Arevik Udumyan]]=

:{{la|Arevik Udumyan}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arevik_Udumyan Stats])

:({{Find sources|Arevik Udumyan}})

Unreferenced article, fails according to WP:GNG, looks like advertisement. Kondi (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete: Ooohhh, cute girl! Absolutely no sign of notability at all on Google (at least not in languages I can read), but very cute! -- BenTels (talk) 17:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment I'm pretty sure "cute" establishes notability. The article may not be, but the girl sure is! Яεñ99 (talk) 09:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment I found this: [http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fesyes.am%2F2012%2F04%2F09%2F%25D5%25A1%25D6%2580%25D6%2587%25D5%25AB%25D5%25AF-%25D5%25B8%25D6%2582%25D5%25A4%25D5%25B8%25D6%2582%25D5%25B4%25D5%25B5%25D5%25A1%25D5%25B6%2F&act=url Yes Journal], which looks to be a suitable source, and this: [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.av-show.com%2F%3Fln%3Dam%26page%3Dperson%26id%3D693 AV Show Production], which I think is not independent, but it's hard going (Google translate is helping). I have a query over the copyright of the picture as it appears in both sources. Unless more significant coverage in reliable, independent sources can be found, I'm inclined to delete per WP:GNG. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.