Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aricca Vitanza

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Aricca Vitanza}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Aricca Vitanza}})

This article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as there are insufficient reliable sources to establish its significance. Additionally, the content appears promotional. I propose deletion based on WP:GNG (General Notability Guideline) and WP:NOTPROMOTION.

This person is not notable enough to warrant a wikipedia page. The historical background of this person is mostly heresay, there does not exist any sources to verify the claims. Whatever links there are are broken or dead.

This is a flagrant self-promotional page. It does not attain the standards wikipedia holds in order to merit an article. 47.153.182.90 (talk) 18:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP nominator--above text is copypasted from this page's talk page. I am neutral at this time. To the nominator: Better to leave your deletion rationale on the article's talk page and to request completion of the nomination at WT:AFD where more people will see it. --Finngall ^talk 15:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Italy, and California. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 23:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.