Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrangemenship

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:NEOLOGISM Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 01:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Arrangemenship]]=

:{{la|Arrangemenship}} ([{{fullurl:Arrangemenship|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrangemenship}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable neologism, fails WP:NEOLOGISM. Seems to be promoting the neologism, and also perhaps the company it's attributed to. Kotiwalo (talk) 13:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete, definition of a non-notable, newly made neologism; those who publicize it likely seek commercial gain. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable. Perhaps transwiki if someone thinks it's a word in some use. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete as Managibberish. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.