Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Dugdale

:{{la|Arthur Dugdale}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arthur_Dugdale Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Arthur Dugdale}})

There does not seem to be enough here to pass wp:SOLDIER; the DSO is not a major gong & if he had actually done anything elseother than going to Winchester & Christ Church I would have thougth that it would have been mentioned in the cited Times obit. The existence of which is not a sign of notability, merely that he is of the class that goes to Winchester and Christ Church.TheLongTone (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

• Keep - CMG & DSO plus Colonel of a regiment during WWI are suitable to pass notability for solider. —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The CMG is not a military honour, and major formations are not commanded by colonels.TheLongTone (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

:The CMG is a major award, per WP:ANYBIO and Queen's Own Oxfordshire Hussars is a big enough regiment that a colonel that commanded them during WWI would be worthy of a bio. He's also found in the various Who's Who of the time, which only includes prominent people, but is snippet view only, so I can't link to it. —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

• Keep. It has long been established that the CBE and above are sufficient to meet WP:ANYBIO. The CMG is a higher award so he clearly qualifies. An obituary in The Times is also considered to be sufficient for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

::In light of the above I withdraw the nomination, altho it seems a ludicrously low bar; some awards are simply made for "being one of us" & not blotting your copybook. This man seems to have led a life of remarkable dullness; the Times Obit, as I suspected, has nothing to say about him. The obits editor was probably at Oxford with him The DSO was awarded in 1919 so I assume comes into this category.TheLongTone (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.